[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: mod_svn 1.7.3 fails to build apache 2.4.1

From: Daniel Shahaf <danielsh_at_elego.de>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:36:45 +0200

Mario Brandt wrote on Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 22:33:14 +0100:
> Hi,
> the tests took felt forever. However.
>
>
> Against apache 2.2 without the patch
>
> C:\python27\python win-tests.py -r --httpd-dir=C:\Apache22-x86
> Summary of test results:
> 1452 tests PASSED
> 73 tests SKIPPED
> 21 tests XFAILED (1 WORK-IN-PROGRESS)
> 68 tests FAILED
>
> against apache 2.4 with the patch
>
> C:\python27\python win-tests.py -r --httpd-dir=C:\Apache24-x86
> Summary of test results:
> 1483 tests PASSED
> 41 tests SKIPPED
> 26 tests XFAILED (1 WORK-IN-PROGRESS)
> 68 tests FAILED
>
> my patch is like http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1232267
> So there is no need to merge my patch, too, if that is backported. I'd
> be glad if that will be in 1.7.5
>
> If wanted I can provied the dav-fails.log
>

Do you see the same set of FAILs in both cases? (The tests are known to
PASS against 2.2 on all platforms and FS backends; so the fact you see
you see 68 fails indicates something's wrong, but it is likely
independent of the httpd-2.4 issues.)

I would also be interested in knowing whether tests pass over bdb, but
if you don't have time for that I can certainly run them myself once I'm
back at my dev environment.

Thanks

Daniel

> Cheers
> Mario
>
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 12:06, Daniel Shahaf <danielsh_at_elego.de> wrote:
> > There are outstanding backport nominations in 1.7.x/STATUS, is your
> > patch needed even after merging them?
> >
> > And on another note -- does the test suite pass?  I've seen odd
> > behaviour with the tests last week and haven't had time to investigate
> > yet.  (Either neon/bdb or serf/bdb.)
> >
Received on 2012-03-13 10:40:14 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.