[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Revprop caching 'n stuff

From: Daniel Shahaf <danielsh_at_elego.de>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 12:25:28 +0200

Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 07:33:03 +0100:
> On 08.03.2012 02:13, Bert Huijben wrote:
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:stsp_at_elego.de]
> >>Sent: donderdag 8 maart 2012 1:28
> >>To: Stefan Fuhrmann
> >>Cc: Subversion Development
> >>Subject: Re: Revprop caching 'n stuff
> >>
> >>On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 11:40:40PM +0100, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> >>>Hi all,
> >
> >>And this shared mem approach will work with both threaded as well as
> >>multi-process servers?
> >>
> >>If so, this sounds like a good plan to me.
> >This still assumes that the repository is only used by a single machine,
> >while using NFS paths with multiple servers is not uncommon. (I heard from a
> >few of those setups on users_at_s.a.o)
>
> That is correct. Those users will not be able to use
> revprop caching. And this is one of the reasons why
> it will need to be activated explicitly.

Could those users use memcached for the revision proplists?
Received on 2012-03-08 11:26:16 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.