Re: request to clarify and improve Subversion property name specification

On 01/23/2012 10:13 AM, Garret Wilson wrote:
> By the lack of response am I to conclude that rigorous specification and
> client interoperability are not considered high priorities on this list?

Conclude what you will. But a more accurate conclusion might be "I've only
allowed a single 'business day' for discussion of this thread, so perhaps I
should wait a bit longer for folks to chime in." I can't speak for others
of course, but I only *just* got around to reading your original post a few
minutes before this your follow-up hit the list.

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand