Re: request to clarify and improve Subversion property name specification

On 1/23/2012 7:17 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 01/23/2012 10:13 AM, Garret Wilson wrote:
>> By the lack of response am I to conclude that rigorous specification and
>> client interoperability are not considered high priorities on this list?
> Conclude what you will. But a more accurate conclusion might be "I've only
> allowed a single 'business day' for discussion of this thread, so perhaps I
> should wait a bit longer for folks to chime in."

Oh, goodness---has it only...? Ah, you are so right---it has only been
one business day!

OK, fair enough. :D You know, when you have your head down coding and
running into walls and coding some more, sometimes the days pass and it
feels like eternity.

Garret
Received on 2012-01-23 16:22:14 CET