ok to extend svn:externals syntax? -- was: Re: AW: [PATCH] commit --include-externals (v2)
From: Neels J Hofmeyr <neels_at_elego.de>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 21:34:30 +0100
On 11/10/2011 07:10 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
I think there is general agreement (to the degree of common sense?) that
> I prefer that file externals be treated the same way as directory externals
I would be fine with keeping current trunk: it changes file externals'
But I think we still do need to add a way of making an external get included
It was suggested to extend the svn:externals syntax, adding a flag that
[-rN] [-c] <URL>@P <PATH>
-c = include in a recursive commit
Does that sound like a good plan?
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.