[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: ok to extend svn:externals syntax? -- was: Re: AW: [PATCH] commit --include-externals (v2)

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 18:32:43 +0200

Neels J Hofmeyr wrote on Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 21:34:30 +0100:
> It was suggested to extend the svn:externals syntax, adding a flag
> that marks externals that should behave differently. By now this
> seems to me to be the best way out. What would that look like?
> [-rN] [-c] <URL>@P <PATH>
> -c = include in a recursive commit
> (positions of -r and -c exchangeable)
> Does that sound like a good plan?

How does 1.7.0 behave when it runs into an externals property with such a value?
Received on 2011-11-13 17:33:27 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.