[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Do we need to store redundant mergeinfo?

From: Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 20:03:20 +0000

Paul Burba <ptburba_at_gmail.com> writes:

> Does this answer your question at all (or did I answer a different
> question ;-)

That's the cyclic merge again. Storing the transitive mergeinfo makes
cyclic merge work in some circumstances but not in others. What we are
trying to determine is whether that is the only use for transitive

uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy
Received on 2011-11-10 21:03:57 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.