Re: Do we need to store redundant mergeinfo?
From: Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 20:03:20 +0000
Paul Burba <ptburba_at_gmail.com> writes:
> Does this answer your question at all (or did I answer a different
That's the cyclic merge again. Storing the transitive mergeinfo makes
-- uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy http://www.uberSVN.comReceived on 2011-11-10 21:03:57 CET |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.