On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Hyrum K Wright
<hyrum.wright_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Hyrum K Wright
> <hyrum.wright_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
>> I know that 1.7.0 is less than 24 hours old at this point, but it's
>> been a couple of week since the magic revision, and we've already
>> started to collect various merged items in CHANGES. Given what I
>> expect to be rapid feedback from our early adopters, I'd like to
>> propose that we shoot for a 1.7.1 near the end of October. I'd
>> probably cut the tarballs on Oct. 27/28 and we'd go forward from
>> there.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> I'll add my own thoughts here. :)
>
> We've got several quite-frequent bug reports coming in to users@,
> including several various assertions and some crashes. Most of them
> are fixed on trunk and nominated for backport, with issue 4035 being
> the major unfixed issue right now. As soon as that gets fixed, and
> everything gets proper review for backport, I'd like to cut 1.7.1,
> instead of waiting for the end of the week. Our users deserve it.
Update: Philip is still working on some aspects of the workqueue
checksum assertion, but seems to have a pretty good lead. I'd like to
get that fix into the release, as it appears to be the most frequent
bug reported on users@. As soon as we have a fix that is tested,
reviewed and merged, I'll cut 1.7.1. Hopefully that will be this
week.
-Hyrum
--
uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy
http://www.uberSVN.com/
Received on 2011-10-18 16:37:41 CEST