Hi Stefan,
Stefan Sperling writes:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 01:55:27PM -0400, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> I could just be basing it on the original proposal. Maybe that planted the
>> seed with me that it was going to be faster:
>>
>> http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2010-07/0154.shtml
>
> The proposal says:
>
> "it currently performs significantly better than `svnsync` because it
> doesn't need to touch the filesystem or apply any deltas."
>
> I would guess this benefit is probably only measurable with file:// URLs.
Yes, I recall initially comparing their performances with file://
URLs, but that was a long time ago. It's possible that svnsync is
equally fast now. And yes, today's concerns are related to the
usecase of importing from/ exporting into Git: so, for
feedback-driven-optimization, we'll need to develop a new benchmark.
Thanks.
-- Ram
Received on 2011-08-17 22:40:38 CEST