[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Performance comparison of svnrdump and svnsync

From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:47:34 +0200

On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 01:55:27PM -0400, Mark Phippard wrote:
> I could just be basing it on the original proposal. Maybe that planted the
> seed with me that it was going to be faster:
>
> http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2010-07/0154.shtml

The proposal says:

"it currently performs significantly better than `svnsync` because it
doesn't need to touch the filesystem or apply any deltas."

I would guess this benefit is probably only measurable with file:// URLs.
Received on 2011-08-17 20:48:08 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.