[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Did we have ^/clients?

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 23:44:06 +0300

No worries, thanks for confirming, documented in r1158438.

C. Michael Pilato wrote on Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 15:55:02 -0400:
> On 08/16/2011 02:58 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Arfrever found:
> >
> > http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=495&dsMessageId=251335
> > http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=251328
> > http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=251344
> >
> > Subject lines
> > "svn.collab.net is going down for a bit."
> > "Client source code migration [gsvn, rapidsvn]"
> > "svn commit: rev 6880 - clients"
> >
> > which collectively indicate that:
> >
> > * ^/clients existed
> > * it contained rapidsvn, winsvn, gsvn
> > * it was removed in r6880
> > * the history was moved to new repositories, and removed from the
> > s.c.n/repos/svn repository
>
> The results of your archaeological expedition match the echoes of what
> memories I have of those events. (Sorry for not seeing your mail earlier
> and saving you the hunt.)
>
> > Aside from this, I recall at least one more instance where history was
> > munged: prior to the 1.5.0 release, when svn:mergeinfo generated by
> > 1.5-dev clients were retroactively modified. Were there additional
> > instances?
>
> I can't currently recall any additional instances of history munging.
>
> --
> C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
Received on 2011-08-16 22:44:45 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.