[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Did we have ^/clients?

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:55:02 -0400

On 08/16/2011 02:58 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Arfrever found:
>
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=495&dsMessageId=251335
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=251328
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=251344
>
> Subject lines
> "svn.collab.net is going down for a bit."
> "Client source code migration [gsvn, rapidsvn]"
> "svn commit: rev 6880 - clients"
>
> which collectively indicate that:
>
> * ^/clients existed
> * it contained rapidsvn, winsvn, gsvn
> * it was removed in r6880
> * the history was moved to new repositories, and removed from the
> s.c.n/repos/svn repository

The results of your archaeological expedition match the echoes of what
memories I have of those events. (Sorry for not seeing your mail earlier
and saving you the hunt.)

> Aside from this, I recall at least one more instance where history was
> munged: prior to the 1.5.0 release, when svn:mergeinfo generated by
> 1.5-dev clients were retroactively modified. Were there additional
> instances?

I can't currently recall any additional instances of history munging.

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand
Received on 2011-08-16 21:55:37 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.