Re: [VOTE]: Default http-client for 1.7 Serf or Neon

On 05.08.2011 04:52, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 08/04/2011 09:47 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
>> On the veto issue, it's odd that Greg is veto a revert of a commit change
>> that originally occurred on trunk and is now sitting on the branch. It
>> does seem odd one can veto the move back to the original default
>> implementation.
>>
>> Just wondering, couldn't we veto the commit that made serf the default?
> Eh... sounds like politickin'... let's not go there, please.

Speaking of politicking, I don't see any technical explanation for
Greg's veto in the 1.7.x STATUS, which causes me to wonder why anyone is
treating it as valid in the first place.

-- Brane
Received on 2011-08-05 05:44:03 CEST