On 08/04/2011 09:47 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
> On the veto issue, it's odd that Greg is veto a revert of a commit change
> that originally occurred on trunk and is now sitting on the branch. It
> does seem odd one can veto the move back to the original default
> Just wondering, couldn't we veto the commit that made serf the default?
Eh... sounds like politickin'... let's not go there, please.
The Subversion committers have consistently demonstrated a keen ability (and
desire) to work out our differences quickly and without even resorting to
something as formal as a vote. I mean, I can count on one hand the number
of such votes ... maybe on one finger, even! I'm not even quite sure that a
call for vote in this situation was really necessary, as we already have a
mechanism in place for addressing the technical question before us (the
1.7.x/STATUS voting system). To the degree that we can avoid resorting to
mere rule-by-the-majority and continue working toward peaceful consensus,
the greater Subversion community benefits.
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
Received on 2011-08-05 04:59:25 CEST