[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r1153493 - /subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 17:40:29 +0300

cmpilato_at_apache.org wrote on Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 14:00:39 -0000:
> + (As an aside, Serf's potential as a platform for future
> + improvement remains unproven and doubtful. For example, HTTPv2
> + removes canonical resource URLs, which works against the caching
> + proxy concept that seems to be the strongest argument in favor of
> + Serf's approach. But that's not strictly germane here.)

That sounds odd for caching not to be taken into consideration in
HTTPv2's design. And glancing at the httpv2 design notes suggests that
it was explicitly a goal.

Are you saying that somehow HTTPv2 actually made the cacheability
situation worse in some cases? Or just that it doesn't make the
situation as as good as it promised to?
Received on 2011-08-03 16:42:57 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.