[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] Server-transmitted "final SHA1 checksums" (Was: "large number of large binary files in subversion")

From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 17:47:14 +0200

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:30:39AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> I held off on committing my RA work because there were no consumers. But
> I've still considering making the change because a) there's no penalty for
> doing so, and b) maybe if we add the requisite client-side magic in 1.8, 1.7
> servers would already be advertising the sha1 checksum that code would need.

Sounds like an excellent plan to me, if there really is no penalty.
Received on 2011-05-24 17:47:51 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.