Re: [PATCH] Server-transmitted "final SHA1 checksums" (Was: "large number of large binary files in subversion")

On May 24, 2011 11:47 AM, "Stefan Sperling" <stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:30:39AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> > I held off on committing my RA work because there were no consumers.
 But
> > I've still considering making the change because a) there's no penalty
for
> > doing so, and b) maybe if we add the requisite client-side magic in 1.8,
1.7
> > servers would already be advertising the sha1 checksum that code would
need.
>
> Sounds like an excellent plan to me, if there really is no penalty.

Agreed!
Received on 2011-05-25 11:33:37 CEST