[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Performance benchmarks

From: John Beranek <john_at_redux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:51:57 +0100

On 28/03/2011 23:45, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 17:42, John Beranek <john_at_redux.org.uk> wrote:
>> On 25/03/2011 17:33, Mark Phippard wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I have been working on a framework for writing tests to record
>>> performance. I have something good enough to share:
>> May I make an observation about these benchmarks...?
>> When I provided some benchmarks that included 'checkout' tests I was
>> specifically asked to make tests that separate WC and RA functionality.
>> I did this, released results, and the (portable) benchmark code.
>> Now Mark has released a new set of benchmarks, which don't separate WC
>> and RA functionality. No one has (yet) noted this fact. ;)
> I think your benchmarks are going to be more helpful for us to locate
> hotspots and get them fixed. Mark's seem more high-level, for
> policy-making rather than coding.
> Did your benchmark scripts get checked in? (I've been out a couple
> weeks and may have missed that) And whether they did or not, would you
> want commit access to get them committed, and/or continue work on them
> within the svn repository?

I checked them into a Git repository, both for ease of repository
creation, and for ease of cloning. Of course, hosting SVN tools in Git
may be seen as sacrilegious by some... ;)


John Beranek                         To generalise is to be an idiot.
http://redux.org.uk/                                 -- William Blake

Received on 2011-03-29 00:52:45 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.