[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Performance benchmarks

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:45:43 -0400

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 17:42, John Beranek <john_at_redux.org.uk> wrote:
> On 25/03/2011 17:33, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have been working on a framework for writing tests to record
>> performance.  I have something good enough to share:
>
> May I make an observation about these benchmarks...?
>
> When I provided some benchmarks that included 'checkout' tests I was
> specifically asked to make tests that separate WC and RA functionality.
>
> I did this, released results, and the (portable) benchmark code.
>
> Now Mark has released a new set of benchmarks, which don't separate WC
> and RA functionality. No one has (yet) noted this fact. ;)

I think your benchmarks are going to be more helpful for us to locate
hotspots and get them fixed. Mark's seem more high-level, for
policy-making rather than coding.

Did your benchmark scripts get checked in? (I've been out a couple
weeks and may have missed that) And whether they did or not, would you
want commit access to get them committed, and/or continue work on them
within the svn repository?

Cheers,
-g
Received on 2011-03-29 00:46:12 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.