[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Performance benchmarks

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 20:33:29 -0400

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 18:51, John Beranek <john_at_redux.org.uk> wrote:
> On 28/03/2011 23:45, Greg Stein wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 17:42, John Beranek <john_at_redux.org.uk> wrote:
>>> On 25/03/2011 17:33, Mark Phippard wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I have been working on a framework for writing tests to record
>>>> performance.  I have something good enough to share:
>>>
>>> May I make an observation about these benchmarks...?
>>>
>>> When I provided some benchmarks that included 'checkout' tests I was
>>> specifically asked to make tests that separate WC and RA functionality.
>>>
>>> I did this, released results, and the (portable) benchmark code.
>>>
>>> Now Mark has released a new set of benchmarks, which don't separate WC
>>> and RA functionality. No one has (yet) noted this fact. ;)
>>
>> I think your benchmarks are going to be more helpful for us to locate
>> hotspots and get them fixed. Mark's seem more high-level, for
>> policy-making rather than coding.
>>
>> Did your benchmark scripts get checked in? (I've been out a couple
>> weeks and may have missed that) And whether they did or not, would you
>> want commit access to get them committed, and/or continue work on them
>> within the svn repository?
>
> I checked them into a Git repository, both for ease of repository
> creation, and for ease of cloning. Of course, hosting SVN tools in Git
> may be seen as sacrilegious by some... ;)

Heh. I certainly don't mind. They just aren't going to get a lot of
attention outside of our own repository, I think.

At a minimum, what's the URL?

Cheers,
-g
Received on 2011-03-29 02:34:00 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.