Those names are simply to ensure we have universally unique names.
There is no concrete reason to associate any semantics with them. We
could have generated a UUID instead.
So: I'd say that we keep the names as-is, and leave a note to change
them to s.a.o in the 2.0 timeframe (if that ever happens!).
Cheers,
-g
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 14:03, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
> Sorry if this was previously discussed, but there at least a couple of areas
> of our code still referring to subversion.tigris.org, and I was wondering
> what (if anything) we plan to do about them.
>
> The first is our custom DAV XML namespaces. You can see these defined in
> include/svn_dav.h.
>
> The second is our runtime configuration subsystem, which uses "Tigris.org"
> as a Windows registry key. See config_file.c and config_impl.h in libsvn_subr.
>
> It's quite possible (likely, even) that we've just decided to punt on these
> until 2.0. But I figured I'd ask since it crossed my mind. Whatever we
> decide, I'd like to ensure that the issue tracker records that decision and
> milestones any actions accordingly.
>
> --
> C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
>
>
Received on 2011-02-19 03:14:28 CET