Re: More s.t.o -> s.a.o code changes

On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 05:13, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Those names are simply to ensure we have universally unique names.
> There is no concrete reason to associate any semantics with them. We
> could have generated a UUID instead.
>
> So: I'd say that we keep the names as-is, and leave a note to change
> them to s.a.o in the 2.0 timeframe (if that ever happens!).
>
+1.

-- 
Ivan Zhakov