Re: [Issue 3770] New - JavaHL method to set binary property is broken

On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Hyrum K Wright <hyrum_at_hyrumwright.org> wrote:

> Mark,
> Daniel pointed out on IRC that all the revpropTable arguments in the
> JavaHL API are Map<String, String>.  Should they be adjusted to
> Map<String, byte[]> ?

What is the rule for revision properties? I thought they had to be
UTF-8 strings, in which case the Java String class seems more
appropriate than using Byte[] which would imply the user can assign
binary values to the property. If Revision properties can contain
binary values, then yes we should not be using String here.

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/