Daniel Trebbien wrote on Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 14:43:24 -0800:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 3:43 AM, Gavin Beau Baumanis
> <gavinb_at_thespidernet.com> wrote:
> > Hi Daniel (T),
> > Since in your earlier post you mentioned that you didn't mind a friendly reminder...
> > I thought I would return this thread to the top of the list - Just i case you had missed Daniel (Shahaf) 's comments.
> > Gavin "Beau" Baumanis
> Hi Gavin,
> I posted a new version of the patch on November 8
> which addressed Daniel Shahaf's feedback from November 1. Daniel S.
> responded the next day with more feedback
> I then suggested a macro solution
> and Julian commented that a macro solution is not preferred
> Julian is right that I can "feel" why not, so now I am trying to think
> of another approach to avoid the `if (translated_eol)` check from
> being executed unnecessarily. I feel stuck, though :(
I hope you aren't discouraged from working on the patch.
To the point, I originally asked if your changes affected the performance
of checkout/export. That is not a reason to stop the patch in its tracks;
it's a question that should be answered (either way) and the patch then
proceed. So, firstly, do your changes have any noticeable performance
effect, or is the effect of the added per-line condition simply not
If the latter, then I apologize (to Daniel) for your having spent time
writing patches (in various "creative" ways :)) that address what is
As I don't recall (m)any other issues with the patch, I think it's
a short distance from resolving this issue to committing the patch.
> p.s. To avoid confusion, you can call me Danny if you would like. I
> like that name, and it comes in handy when working with other Daniels
And I'm danielsh, if it helps.
(btw, the firstnames distribution in COMMITTERS is... interesting.)
Received on 2010-11-25 10:25:11 CET