[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] extend svn_subst_translate_string() to record whether re-encoding and/or line ending translation were performed (v. 2)

From: Daniel Trebbien <dtrebbien_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:43:24 -0800

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 3:43 AM, Gavin Beau Baumanis
<gavinb_at_thespidernet.com> wrote:
> Hi Daniel (T),
>
> Since in your earlier post you mentioned that you didn't mind a friendly reminder...
>
> I thought I would return this thread to the top of the list  - Just i case you had missed Daniel (Shahaf) 's comments.
>
>
> Gavin "Beau" Baumanis

Hi Gavin,

I posted a new version of the patch on November 8
(http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.devel/123657)
which addressed Daniel Shahaf's feedback from November 1. Daniel S.
responded the next day with more feedback
(http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.devel/123719).
 I then suggested a macro solution
(http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.devel/123817)
and Julian commented that a macro solution is not preferred
(http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.devel/123820).

Julian is right that I can "feel" why not, so now I am trying to think
of another approach to avoid the `if (translated_eol)` check from
being executed unnecessarily. I feel stuck, though :(

p.s. To avoid confusion, you can call me Danny if you would like. I
like that name, and it comes in handy when working with other Daniels
:)
Received on 2010-11-24 23:44:00 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.