Re: Subversion in 2010
From: Peter Samuelson <peter_at_p12n.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 10:43:16 -0600
That's one of those features I don't think I'd ever miss if it were
> > * Full history of at least one branch is generally stored on clients.
I would add:
* No commitment to partial working copies. By which I mean both WCs
* No commitment to merging only part of a revision. This is another
Anyway, I guess I just agree that there are a lot of simplifications
-- Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/Received on 2010-01-06 17:43:53 CET
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.