Re: Subversion in 2010
From: Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:16:55 +0000
Greg Hudson wrote:
Heh. A vision that's simple to attain is hardly a vision.
What we can usefully do is identify popular features of git/Mercurial
> The major architectural differences between
> * No commitment to mixed-revision working copies.
That sounds interesting, but I haven't got to grips with what it really
> * Full history of at least one branch is generally stored on clients.
I wonder whether full history is logically necessary for the behaviours
> * DVCS workflow support.
We have already discussed some DVCS workflow options at a high level,
> For small projects and a certain class of developers, these can be huge
> (See also http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2008-04/1020.shtml)
Ah yes, that email (from David Glasser) on the subject of what
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.