[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [RFC] which bug tracker to use?

From: Larry Shatzer <fugazi_at_zyx.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 09:20:56 -0700

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Ivan Zhakov <ivan_at_visualsvn.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Now that we're in the Incubator and on our way to becoming an Apache
>> project, one of the items that we need to select is which bug tracker
>> to use.
>>
>> I'll preface this with: the ASF does not *mandate* that we use its
>> facilities for bug tracking. It only wants source control and the
>> original distribution point to be on ASF hardware. I'm not necessarily
>> advocating that we keep a separate tracker (user confusion), but it is
>> possible. Weigh the pros/cons in your mind.
>>
>> The ASF provides two bug trackers:
>>
>> 1) Jira at http://issues.apache.org/jira/
>>
> My vote is +1 for JIRA: it's commercial product with good enough
> quality. It's highly customizable.
>
> Closed-source shouldn't be problem since JIRA Enterprise Edition comes
> with *full* source code and I'm sure that ASF Infrastructure Team has
> access to them.

The open source license that ASF has does not come with the source.
You need to be a paying customer to get access to that.

-- Larry

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2415835
Received on 2009-11-09 17:21:09 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.