[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [RFC] which bug tracker to use?

From: Ivan Zhakov <ivan_at_visualsvn.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 19:13:39 +0300

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Now that we're in the Incubator and on our way to becoming an Apache
> project, one of the items that we need to select is which bug tracker
> to use.
>
> I'll preface this with: the ASF does not *mandate* that we use its
> facilities for bug tracking. It only wants source control and the
> original distribution point to be on ASF hardware. I'm not necessarily
> advocating that we keep a separate tracker (user confusion), but it is
> possible. Weigh the pros/cons in your mind.
>
> The ASF provides two bug trackers:
>
> 1) Jira at http://issues.apache.org/jira/
>
My vote is +1 for JIRA: it's commercial product with good enough
quality. It's highly customizable.

Closed-source shouldn't be problem since JIRA Enterprise Edition comes
with *full* source code and I'm sure that ASF Infrastructure Team has
access to them.

-- 
Ivan Zhakov
VisualSVN Team
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2415833
Received on 2009-11-09 17:13:52 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.