[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: State of the bindings buildbot

From: Hyrum K. Wright <hyrum_at_hyrumwright.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 09:47:44 -0500

On Oct 21, 2009, at 9:38 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Joe Swatosh
> <joe.swatosh_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 6:26 AM, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Joe Swatosh
>>> <joe.swatosh_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> There is a Java error and failure also. I apologize for the long
>>>> time
>>>> that the bindings buildbot has been failing due to Ruby, and
>>>> masking
>>>> other potential problems. Now that the Ruby bindings are close to
>>>> passing again, I hope that the Java bindings will get fixed soon,
>>>> too.
>>> The failure is relatively new, and involves the diff tests. There
>>> is
>>> work going on in this area and there have been failing tests in the
>>> main test suite, so I suspect these are related. I have been
>>> holding
>>> off looking at it until that work seems done, as I kind of expected
>>> the test to start working again. Based on the assertion failure, it
>> I know what you mean. I was just getting excited to see a green
>> build,
>> after the Ruby bindings being the bad actor for such a long time. I
>> should have realized you were tracking....
> I was able to find the problem in the library and fixed it in r40148,
> so the prodding was worthwhile!
> I can fix the other JavaHL test by using --accept=theirs-conflict
> instead of theirs-full. For the purposes of the test I was doing it
> does not change anything. I worry that I am just covering up a real
> error that needs to be fixed though. I am not clear as to why the
> main tests are Green with this problem still in place. Every command
> line user will see it when they use that accept option.

Is there a commandline test for it? If not, could we write one? If
so, I'd be interested to see why it isn't failing, or why it is marked


Received on 2009-10-21 16:48:03 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.