Re: [PATCH] libsvn_wc #1, result_pool/scratch_pool
From: Martin Hauner <martin.hauner_at_gmx.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 17:56:06 +0200
Hi Greg,
On 23.08.09 17:13, Greg Stein wrote:
Oh, I thought it was 72. 78 is nice, then there will be less formatting
> I would suggest files other than log.[ch] -- the loggy subsystem is
Ouch, another wasted hour ;-)
> Some of the adm_* files could be a good place to start.
ok, I will consider the log code as a learning session and move on to the adm
> And yes: multiple smaller patches is much better than a mother patch.
Yep, exactly what I thought.. :-)
> Cheers,
-- Martin Subcommander 2.0.0 Beta 4 - http://subcommander.tigris.org a Win32/Unix/MacOSX subversion GUI client & diff/merge tool. ------------------------------------------------------ http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2386528Received on 2009-08-23 17:56:30 CEST |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.