On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:24, Lieven Govaerts <svnlgo_at_mobsol.be> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Meta:
>> Talking with Hyrum, I skipped sending these commit messages to
>> svn_at_s.t.o per his thinking "that mailing list is for commits to the
>> code".
> Hm, why should we restrict the scope of svn_at_s.t.o to the code repo
> only? I'd use it for all automated commit emails.
>
>> I've pointed the edits here (dev@), since I believe the
>> messages are part of our developer discussion. Your thoughts are
>> welcome.
>
> Commit messages of our source code can be easily made part of a
> developer discussion too, by replying and putting svn-dev as target
> list. Point is that responding to those commit mails is optional,
> whereas a mail to dev is supposed to start a discussion.
Fair enough.
I'll switch it to svn_at_s.t.o in a couple days if nobody has further input.
Thx,
-g
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1889057
Received on 2009-04-24 11:49:36 CEST