Greg Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:24, Lieven Govaerts <svnlgo_at_mobsol.be> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Meta:
>>> Talking with Hyrum, I skipped sending these commit messages to
>>> svn_at_s.t.o per his thinking "that mailing list is for commits to the
>>> code".
>> Hm, why should we restrict the scope of svn_at_s.t.o to the code repo
>> only? I'd use it for all automated commit emails.
>>
>>> I've pointed the edits here (dev@), since I believe the
>>> messages are part of our developer discussion. Your thoughts are
>>> welcome.
>> Commit messages of our source code can be easily made part of a
>> developer discussion too, by replying and putting svn-dev as target
>> list. Point is that responding to those commit mails is optional,
>> whereas a mail to dev is supposed to start a discussion.
>
> Fair enough.
>
> I'll switch it to svn_at_s.t.o in a couple days if nobody has further input.
+1 on switching these emails to svn_at_s.t.o since we already receive commit
related emails there, and I feel these are one such emails, which of course all
devs look at.
--
Senthil Kumaran S
http://www.stylesen.org/
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1889183
Received on 2009-04-24 11:57:08 CEST