On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 14:25, Edmund Wong <ed_at_kdtc.net> wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:31:42PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:55:30PM +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
>>>> Public svn_wc_apply_svnpatch() function still exists. Would it make
>>>> sense to have a public function which applies unidiff parts of
>>>> patches?
>>> Quite possibly, yes. We can make a new one, or promote the
>>> apply_textdiffs() function in libsvn_client/patch.c to public.
>>
>> On second thought, one public function should be enough.
>> It should accept both svnpatches or unidiffs, and do the right thing
>> for each.
>>
>> Stefan
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> Just a matter of curiosity and possibly a stupid question;
> but, why isn't there a message link at the end of your
> message, while there are in others?
Who the hell knows? We have some crappy non-standard mailing list
software running this list. It does a lot of bizarre things that
mailing list software should not do. First and foremost, it should
pass messages intact (and maybe add some headers), but no... it
rewrites message content.
Sigh.
-g
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1746565
Received on 2009-04-16 14:32:09 CEST