On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 14:00, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
<arfrever.fta_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009-04-16 13:53 Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> napisał(a):
>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:33, Branko Cibej <brane_at_xbc.nu> wrote:
>>> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>>> * Current implementation is *slow*.
>>>
>>> I assume you know why and how to fix that, right?
>>
>> Because we still open a SQLite database per directory. LOTS of times
>> for the same file. When we get rid of the extraneous open/close
>> behavior, and (especially) migrate to a single DB, then it will be
>> much faster.
>
> How much work is still required to migrate to a single database?
A ton.
I believe that we have to eliminate almost all uses of
svn_wc_adm_access_t from our codebase before we can do the migration.
We'll be reducing the number of open/close cycles as a natural result
of the elimination. So performance should steadily improve during that
work.
Cheers,
-g
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1746663
Received on 2009-04-16 14:37:19 CEST