On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 11:37:04PM +0800, Edmund Wong wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > Yes it would, good point.
> >
> > So what about the diff below? Running 'make check' on it now.
> >
> > Index: subversion/libsvn_client/delete.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- subversion/libsvn_client/delete.c (revision 36961)
> > +++ subversion/libsvn_client/delete.c (working copy)
> > @@ -64,7 +64,8 @@ find_undeletables(void *baton,
> > (status->prop_status != svn_wc_status_none
> > && status->prop_status != svn_wc_status_normal))
> > return svn_error_createf(SVN_ERR_CLIENT_MODIFIED, NULL,
> > - _("'%s' has local modifications"),
> > + _("'%s' has local modifications, commit or revert "
> > + "them first"),
> > svn_path_local_style(path, pool));
> >
> > return SVN_NO_ERROR;
> >
>
> This is nice and concise. I probably would've been less concise.
> *grin*
Great. r36971.
Thanks,
Stefan
Received on 2009-04-03 18:06:38 CEST