Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Yes it would, good point.
>
> So what about the diff below? Running 'make check' on it now.
>
> Index: subversion/libsvn_client/delete.c
> ===================================================================
> --- subversion/libsvn_client/delete.c (revision 36961)
> +++ subversion/libsvn_client/delete.c (working copy)
> @@ -64,7 +64,8 @@ find_undeletables(void *baton,
> (status->prop_status != svn_wc_status_none
> && status->prop_status != svn_wc_status_normal))
> return svn_error_createf(SVN_ERR_CLIENT_MODIFIED, NULL,
> - _("'%s' has local modifications"),
> + _("'%s' has local modifications, commit or revert "
> + "them first"),
> svn_path_local_style(path, pool));
>
> return SVN_NO_ERROR;
>
This is nice and concise. I probably would've been less concise.
*grin*
Edmund
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1533422
Received on 2009-04-03 17:45:33 CEST