Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
>> 2009-02-09 03:38:18 Hyrum K. Wright napisał(a):
>>> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
>>>> Author: arfrever
>>>> Date: Sun Feb 8 18:36:08 2009
>>>> New Revision: 35748
>>>>
>>>> Log:
>>>> Use '.sql_h' filename extension for headers generated from '.sql' files.
>>> Yes, but Why?
>> This filename extension (or .sql.h) allows to easier distinguish headers generated from .sql files.
>
> Does the text "This file is automatically generated from foo.sql" not accomplish
> the same goal? Why not encode this redundancy in the source file, or even the
> source file name (e.g., rep-cache-db.sql) instead of in *two* different
> locations in the build system? It seems a bit redundant and cryptic.
>
> Btw, I had this conversation with somebody in IRC (and maybe should have
> recorded it here) when the change was made from .sql.h to .h. I originally felt
> that we should munge the output filename somehow, but further consideration has
> led me to be against such.
One more problem: we lose automatic syntax highlighting with the munged
extension. Can you please further justify this change, or revert it?
Thanks,
-Hyrum
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1129436
Received on 2009-02-09 16:23:15 CET