2009-02-09 16:22:36 Hyrum K. Wright napisał(a):
> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> >> 2009-02-09 03:38:18 Hyrum K. Wright napisał(a):
> >>> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> >>>> Author: arfrever
> >>>> Date: Sun Feb 8 18:36:08 2009
> >>>> New Revision: 35748
> >>>>
> >>>> Log:
> >>>> Use '.sql_h' filename extension for headers generated from '.sql' files.
> >>> Yes, but Why?
> >> This filename extension (or .sql.h) allows to easier distinguish headers generated from .sql files.
> >
> > Does the text "This file is automatically generated from foo.sql" not accomplish
> > the same goal? Why not encode this redundancy in the source file, or even the
> > source file name (e.g., rep-cache-db.sql) instead of in *two* different
> > locations in the build system? It seems a bit redundant and cryptic.
> >
> > Btw, I had this conversation with somebody in IRC (and maybe should have
> > recorded it here) when the change was made from .sql.h to .h. I originally felt
> > that we should munge the output filename somehow, but further consideration has
> > led me to be against such.
>
> One more problem: we lose automatic syntax highlighting with the munged
> extension.
:set filetype=c
> Can you please further justify this change, or revert it?
This change allows to genericize the 'fast-clean' target in Makefile.in.
--
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Received on 2009-02-09 18:35:27 CET