[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: What's left TODO for 1.6.x?

From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 00:43:49 +0000

On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 12:43:51AM +0100, Neels Janosch Hofmeyr wrote:
> Mark Phippard wrote:
> > So is tree conflicts ready now or have they just not declared stuff in TO-DO?
> We have removed our TODO items for 1.6 because we resolved them. So, yes,
> we're ready.

> The answer is still yes, we, the tree-conflicts folks not including gstein,
> are ready for a branch. Julian, I'm not running over your mouth, am I?

The only thing I can think of is issue #3334

Has Branko's 'item state' proposal from this thread been implemented?

Meanwhile, I will (slowly) work on trying to add tree-conflict-related
content to the svnbook in time for release.


Received on 2008-12-08 10:41:06 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.