Re: What's left TODO for 1.6.x?
From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 00:43:49 +0000
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 12:43:51AM +0100, Neels Janosch Hofmeyr wrote:
> The answer is still yes, we, the tree-conflicts folks not including gstein,
The only thing I can think of is issue #3334
Has Branko's 'item state' proposal from this thread been implemented?
Meanwhile, I will (slowly) work on trying to add tree-conflict-related
Stefan
------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.