[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: What's left TODO for 1.6.x?

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 18:58:18 -0800

I'll get my stuff mostly cleared in the next 24 hours. If not all,
then I'll provide a status update.

On Dec 7, 2008, at 16:43, Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 12:43:51AM +0100, Neels Janosch Hofmeyr wrote:
>> Mark Phippard wrote:
>>> So is tree conflicts ready now or have they just not declared
>>> stuff in TO-DO?
>>
>> We have removed our TODO items for 1.6 because we resolved them.
>> So, yes,
>> we're ready.
>
>> The answer is still yes, we, the tree-conflicts folks not including
>> gstein,
>> are ready for a branch. Julian, I'm not running over your mouth, am
>> I?
>
> The only thing I can think of is issue #3334
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3334
>
> Has Branko's 'item state' proposal from this thread been implemented?
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsMessageId=103910&dsForumId=462
>
> Meanwhile, I will (slowly) work on trying to add tree-conflict-related
> content to the svnbook in time for release.
>
> Stefan
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=980972

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=981012
Received on 2008-12-08 10:41:19 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.