[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: What's left TODO for 1.6.x?

From: Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:21:20 +0000

Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 12:43:51AM +0100, Neels Janosch Hofmeyr wrote:
> > Mark Phippard wrote:
> > > So is tree conflicts ready now or have they just not declared stuff in TO-DO?
> >
> > We have removed our TODO items for 1.6 because we resolved them. So, yes,
> > we're ready.
> > The answer is still yes, we, the tree-conflicts folks not including gstein,
> > are ready for a branch. Julian, I'm not running over your mouth, am I?

I agree, Neels... except for this issue:

> The only thing I can think of is issue #3334
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3334
> Has Branko's 'item state' proposal from this thread been implemented?
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsMessageId=103910&dsForumId=462

These two are the same thing. It is currently listed in TODO-1.6 as the
"merry-go-round" item in the "after branching" section, but, like Mark
indicates, I think it would be unwise to branch with a major change
still needed, so I'll move it to "before branching".

Mark Phippard wrote:
> What about the state of tests? Last I checked the bindings were not
> all passing. What about Serf? If all the tests are passing and tree
> conflicts is "ready", I'd say +1. I think we should not branch until
> we are ready to go straight to RC1 though.

There are still test failures in Serf. I can do a Serf build but need to
get Apache installed on this machine, or else need someone else to debug
this. From the build-bots, 3 tests fail, all with "EXCEPTION:
FAIL: merge_tests.py 118: tree conflicts on merge, NO local commit 4.1
FAIL: merge_tests.py 119: tree conflicts on merge, NO local commit 4.2
FAIL: merge_tests.py 122: tree conflicts on merge, NO local commit 6

swig-pl and swig-py tests pass. I never managed to build Java and Ruby
bindings and don't know their status.

Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Meanwhile, I will (slowly) work on trying to add tree-conflict-related
> content to the svnbook in time for release.

Fantastic! Thanks.

- Julian

Received on 2008-12-08 15:21:57 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.