[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn edit

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:55:43 +0100

Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Branko Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu> wrote:
>> Harvey, Edward wrote:
>>> For a simple "find" I think this is typical performance:
>>> 100,000 files in 10 sec cold cache
>>> 1,000,000 files in 3 sec warm cache.
>>> I think if this performance can be achieved for "svn st" and "svn up" it's acceptable. I do, however, doubt being able to achieve that while walking the tree with svn - because git failed to achieve it.
>> Oh I say, that's a truly obnoxious statement. Second of all, a version
>> control system has a lot more to do than a simple find. But first of
>> all, it implies that git is the unattainable grail of software
>> perfection. Perish the thought.
> Brane: clearly you're both ugly and stupid. :-)

Yup, and I prefer it that way. :-P

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-10-30 21:56:02 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.