Re: svn edit

On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Branko Èibej <brane_at_xbc.nu> wrote:
> Harvey, Edward wrote:
>> For a simple "find" I think this is typical performance:
>>
>> 100,000 files in 10 sec cold cache
>> 1,000,000 files in 3 sec warm cache.
>>
>> I think if this performance can be achieved for "svn st" and "svn up" it's acceptable. I do, however, doubt being able to achieve that while walking the tree with svn - because git failed to achieve it.
>
> Oh I say, that's a truly obnoxious statement. Second of all, a version
> control system has a lot more to do than a simple find. But first of
> all, it implies that git is the unattainable grail of software
> perfection. Perish the thought.

Brane: clearly you're both ugly and stupid. :-)
Received on 2008-10-30 19:45:15 CET