Re: Base text files, re: IRC chat

Minimal subcommands has been a design point since inception. Keeping
the count low makes svn more approachable.

But I'm not really worried at this point. That is a bikeshed to paint
later...

Cheers,
-g

On Sep 15, 2008, at 17:09, Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 04:26:32PM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
>> Didn't say it was the best idea :-)
>>
>> Main point is to avoid new subcommands if at all possible.
>
> Why? I'd say let's try to focus on creating an intuitively
> usable program. If a new subcommand is needed for that, so be it.
>
> And having 'svn wc' as a subcommand to manage working copies
> would be hilarious :)
> (I can't think of a better name right now, but 'svn workingcopy'
> is too long.)
>
> Stefan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-09-15 23:38:54 CEST