Re: Releasing 1.6

Hello,

Stefan Sperling wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 01:21:40PM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
[...]
> After reading everything which has accumulated over night
> in this thread (from the point of view of my timezone), I get the
> impression that the following are the options being discussed:
>
> 1). Let Mark, Senthil and whoever wants to join their effort
> create a feature-branch based on 1.5.x.
[...]
> To prevent version confusion among our users, vendors are
> asked to ship binaries compiled from this branch to the general
> public only if they are explicitly designated as not being based
> on the official Subversion-1.5.x code, because they contain
> features not present in stock 1.5.x.

Looking at the experience that people ("user") are not able to
distinguish between CVS, CVSNT and WinCVS, I doubt people will be able
to actually distinguish between an "official" and such an "inofficial"
one.

Note that I do not vote for either of the options - in fact, I am only a
user, and I doubt I actually am allowed to vote ;) - but I want to
remind you all that this part might not be as easy as you all hope.

Regards,
Spiro.

  "Anybody who would spend considerable effort emulating a C64 is not
  particularly sane to begin with; it is unreasonable to expect them to produce
  sane software."
  ("asuffield" in http://forums.thedailywtf.com/forums/p/7199/134136.aspx)

-- 
Spiro R. Trikaliotis                              http://opencbm.sf.net/
http://www.trikaliotis.net/                     http://www.viceteam.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org