[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: ra_serf/ra_neon/ra_svn comparison

From: Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2008 14:52:19 +0200

Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> I was about to commit the latest patch, but then I thought to see what
> ra_serf does. (A little late, I know.)
> ra_serf, like ra_svn (and unlike ra_neon), currently reports the totals,
> not the deltas (see svn_ra_serf__progress and serf_context_progress_delta).
> Any ideas how to make all three ra layers consistent? Given that two
> different ra layers implemented the "wrong" (= different from neon's)
> (but, IMHO, consistent with the docstring) semantics, I don't think we
> can just ignore that and change svn_ra_progress_notify_func_t's doc
> string now.

I don't mind changing it, as long as it is consistend over all layers.
But for ra_neon, this would require a change in the neon library. And
I'm not sure, but I think that progress notifications for ra_serf were
also not available in 1.4 yet, while neon had this from 1.3 on.


   oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
  (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
    \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
    /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.net

Received on 2008-08-03 14:52:50 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.