[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

ra_serf/ra_neon/ra_svn comparison (was: Re: [PATCH] fix progress callback for ra_svn)

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 15:38:25 +0300 (Jerusalem Daylight Time)

I was about to commit the latest patch, but then I thought to see what
ra_serf does. (A little late, I know.)

ra_serf, like ra_svn (and unlike ra_neon), currently reports the totals,
not the deltas (see svn_ra_serf__progress and serf_context_progress_delta).

Any ideas how to make all three ra layers consistent? Given that two
different ra layers implemented the "wrong" (= different from neon's)
(but, IMHO, consistent with the docstring) semantics, I don't think we
can just ignore that and change svn_ra_progress_notify_func_t's doc
string now.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-08-03 14:38:47 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.