Re: depth of the operation vs. depth of the WC

Rui, Guo wrote:
>>> This function request does make sense. However, it may be really
>>> tricky in the client side. There will be no .svn/entries to store the
>>> depth value if the directory in question does not exist in advance.
>>> Current design may have to be modified to store a list of excluded
>>> sub-directories in the .svn/entries of the parent directory.
>> The .svn/entries file already stores skeletal information about
>> subdirectories, so you wouldn't be breaking new ground here.
> Hi, C. Michael, Thanks for figure this out. I may have made a wrong
> assumption in my previous post. I'm still a freshman here, lacking in
> lots of detail in the implementation.

No problem. (In the grand scheme of the Universe, we're all ultimately
freshmen). I merely wanted to help you learn more of those implementation
details.

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand