[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: depth of the operation vs. depth of the WC

From: Rui, Guo <timmyguo_at_mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 01:31:10 +0800

> > This function request does make sense. However, it may be really tricky
> > the client side. There will be no .svn/entries to store the depth value
> > the directory in question does not exist in advance. Current design may
> > to be modified to store a list of excluded sub-directories in the
> > .svn/entries of the parent directory.
> The .svn/entries file already stores skeletal information about
> subdirectories, so you wouldn't be breaking new ground here.
Hi, C. Michael,
Thanks for figure this out. I may have made a wrong assumption in my
previous post. I'm still a freshman here, lacking in lots of detail in the

Rui, Guo
> --
> C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-04-04 19:31:34 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.